JCTA was first established in 1968. Over thirty-five years later we are the recognized bargaining agent for over 6,000 certified personnel employed by Jefferson County Public Schools. We represent teachers, librarians, speech clinicians, physical therapists and occupational therapists in every one of the public schools in Jefferson County. 

Our mission is to serve as the active voice of our members; promote quality and equity in public schools; expand and protect the rights and interests of our members; and advocate human, civil and economic rights for all.
 


» Pension Benefits Inject $3.4 Billion into the Economies of Kentucky Counties
 
 

As the governor and General Assembly consider additional cuts to pension benefits for employees, it’s important to understand the role such benefits play in local economies. In 2016, public retirees of the Kentucky Employees’ Retirement System, State Police Retirement System, County Employees Retirement System and Kentucky Teachers’ Retirement System received pensions totaling $3.4 billion.  That’s the economic equivalent of an entire industry — for comparison, the accommodations and food services industry in Kentucky generated $4.5 billion in earnings in 2015 while the construction industry generated $7 billion, according to the Bureau of Economic Analysis.

 

Read more about how pensions benefit communities in the article below:

Pension Benefits Inject $3.4 Billion into the Economies of Kentucky Counties

 




» Louisville BATS Sponsor Teacher Appreciation Night
 
 



» Educators Oppose Trump Plan to Scrap Teacher-Support Program By Alyson Klein April 3, 2017 Article Tools PrintPrinter-Friendly EmailEmail Article ReprintReprints CommentsComments Federal funding for educator quality helped a small district outside Bosto
 
 

Educators Oppose Trump Plan to Scrap Teacher-Support Program
By Alyson Klein

 

Federal funding for educator quality helped a small district outside Boston cut down class sizes for beginning teachers. A cadre of Delaware districts used it to help teachers better personalize instruction for students. And the school district in El Paso, Texas, which is always on the lookout for teachers with expertise in working with English-language learners, has used some of the money for recruitment.


Those activities—and thousands of educators’ jobs—could be in jeopardy if Congress takes President Donald Trump up on his proposal to get rid of the Supporting Effective Instruction State Grant program, better known to school districts as Title II, after the portion of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act that governs it.


Eliminating the $2.3 billion program could hamper implementation of the law’s newest version, the Every Student Succeeds Act. It also could lead to teacher layoffs and make it tougher for educators to reach English-learners and other special populations and to make the most of technology in their classrooms, educators and advocates say.

Title II Funding


The Trump administration proposes scrapping the third-largest federal K-12 program, the $2.3 billion Supporting Effective Instruction State Grants, or Title II. Here’s how those grants were distributed in the 2015-16 school year.


The proposed cut is the largest—and arguably, the most consequential—the new president pitched for the U.S. Department of Education in his fiscal 2018 budget request, unveiled earlier this month. Overall, the administration wants to slash spending at the department by $9 billion, or 13 percent of its current, nearly $70 billion budget. The plan would cover the budget year that begins Oct. 1 and generally affects the 2018-19 school year.

The administration has also proposed cutting Title II in half for the current federal fiscal year, according to reports. If that cut goes through, districts would feel the squeeze when classes begin this fall.

The Trump administration doesn’t see Title II as effective. The funds are “poorly targeted and spread thinly across thousands of districts with scant evidence of impact,” according to White House budget documents.

But educators feel differently. Title II, some agree, may need some tweaking. But it pays for programs that help teachers hone their practice.

“If you’re cutting Title II, you’re telling me one of two things,” said Kevin Cormier, who teaches 7th and 8th grade math at Nissitissit Middle School in central Massachusetts. “One, we’re perfect and we can’t develop anymore, or two, we suck and we can’t be helped.”

There may be room for improving Title II, Cormier said, but it also finances valuable work, including an initiative in his district aimed at getting teachers more comfortable with collecting data and analyzing it to improve their practice.

For the Frisco Independent school district near Dallas, which is constantly hiring to keep pace with its ballooning enrollment,

Title II funds are a lifeline for providing professional development to teachers, principals, and other administrative staff members.

The district, whose enrollment shot up from 7,234 students in 2000 to a projected 58,253 this year thanks to a business boom, is planning eight new schools over the next few years, said Manuel Gonzales, the federal programs coordinator.

“We are hiring new principals, new assistant principals, and a large number of new teachers every year because we are growing so rapidly and opening up new schools,” Gonzales said. “With that, there is a significant need to provide professional development for administrators and teachers on best practices in the field—everything from how do they collaborate, how to use data effectively, how to create common formative assessments, how to analyze student work and refine their instruction to improve student learning.”

And the federal cuts would come on top of reductions to state funding, he added.

“If we lose this from the federal government, that’s going to impact us doubly,” Gonzales said.

Effectiveness Questioned

The Trump administration isn’t the first to question Title II, which represents the third-largest pot of money for K-12 in the department.
U.S. Secretary of Education Arne Duncan told Education Week back in 2009 that the program—then funded at $3 billion—didn’t seem to be getting much mileage for the dollar. “Anyone who’d argue you’re getting great value for that $3 billion, I’d love to see that analysis,” he said.
The Obama administration sought tweaks to the program, including making a small portion of it competitive, rather than having the money flow through a formula, but didn’t seek to scrap Title II.

Research on the two main activities districts use their Title II dollars on—class-size reduction, which uses a quarter of the funds, and professional development, which accounts for another half—offer a mixed picture.

Numerous studies have questioned the impact of professional development on student achievement, said Chad Aldeman, a principal at Bellwether Education Partners who served in the Education Department during the Obama administration.
Professional development can help boost teacher confidence and improve their content knowledge, but there isn’t a ton of evidence that those benefits translate into student achievement gains, he said.

But Deborah S. Delisle, the executive director of ASCD, an educational leadership organization, said that gains in student outcomes are only one piece of the puzzle. Professional development helps teachers stay on top of their craft, she said.

“Attempting to define the success of professional development through the single measure of student achievement is flawed logic,” Delisle said in an email. “I wouldn’t trust a doctor who was not continually reading the latest in medical research, and likewise, we can’t pretend that educators don’t need continuous learning opportunities that will help them become more effective in their schools.”

Impact on ESSA Plans


Meanwhile, some studies of class-size reduction, another use of Title II funds, have shown some positive results, while others are inconclusive or don’t show much impact. Class-size reduction seems to have the biggest bang for the buck when it’s done on a large scale, slashing class size by seven or 10 students, and in the earliest grades.
Getting rid of Title II could make the teacher quality portion of states’ ESSA plans more difficult to implement. Those plans are due to be sent to the department beginning in early April.

Pedro Rivera, the state chief in Pennsylvania, said his state considered both teacher preparation and educator effectiveness in writing its plan, which proposes moving to a full-year internship for beginning teachers and bolstering the state’s superintendent and principal academies, he said.


“Now some of the funding we were going [to use] is ... in jeopardy of going away,” Rivera said. In fact, just days before releasing a budget that would get rid of Title II, the Trump administration put out a template for states to use in crafting their ESSA plans that asks, specifically, how states are planning to use Title II dollars to implement the law.
It’s unclear if Congress will take Trump up on the cut.

Aldeman, for one, noted that the money goes out to almost every congressional district. “There’s lots of people affected,” he said. “Almost every congressman has people who would be laid off because of this proposed budget cut.”

Staff Writer Denisa R. Superville contributed to this report.
 

 




» JCPS Transfer Application Deadline
 
 

 

 

 

Please note: The JCPS Transfer Application Process window closes at 11:59 pm on Wednesday, March 22nd. If you are planning to put in a transfer request, you need to do so before the transfer window closes.




» Commissioner Pruitt Holds March 22nd Town Hall Meeting
 
 



Kentucky Education Commissioner Stephen Pruitt will be hosting a regional Town Hall Meeting on Wednesday, March 22nd at the Kentucky School For the Blind Auditorium (1867 Frankfort Avenue Louisville, KY), from 6:30-8:00 pm to gather feedback from Kentuckians on a new accountability system that has been under development for the past year.


“This system goes beyond compliance, focuses on students and truly reflects Kentucky’s values,” Pruitt said. “The comments collected at Town Hall Meetings last year, such as we need to educate the whole child, go beyond test scores, and ensure opportunity and access to a quality education for all, informed the development of the system.”


Under the as yet unnamed system, schools would be evaluated on how well they perform on five indicators: Proficiency, Achievement Gap Closure, Student Growth (elementary and middle school only), Transition Readiness and Opportunity and Access. Each indicator includes multiple measures. Some will be reported only; others will figure into a school’s overall accountability rating. Data will be reported online in a dashboard format that better illustrates school/district progress or deficits than a single number. Data will be reported by student group where available to create more transparency on where gaps may exist.


The work was driven by the congressional reauthorization of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act, known as the Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA). ESSA shifts much of the oversight and responsibility for schools from the federal government to the state – including how accountability is determined and how to define and improve low-performing schools.


Approximately 3,500 Kentuckians, including superintendents, principals, teachers, parents, business and community members and education partners have participated in the accountability system’s development thus far, either through Town Hall Meetings, by providing online feedback or by serving on one of the groups that worked on drafting the system.


“This has been a collaborative effort from the get go,” Pruitt said. “I want to stress that the collaboration doesn’t end here. This round of Town Hall Meetings is just as important as the ones last year. I hope parents, community members, teachers, students, legislators, business owners and concerned citizens will come to these meetings ready to share their thoughts and ideas,” he added. “It’s in everyone’s best interest to create a system that will prepare our students to be successful, productive citizens of the Commonwealth.”

 

 




» NAACP Denounces HB 151
 
 

February 22, 2017


“The purpose of education is to transmit from one generation to the next, the accumulated wisdom and knowledge of the society and to prepare the young people for their future membership in society and active participation in its maintenance and development.” Julius Nyerere, Ujamna, 1968


Dear Representative:


Given that purpose of education it then stands that the authors and proponents of House Bill 151 have not yet grasped from years of learnings and court cases that the impact and intent of HB 151 are to take us back to a bygone era. Under the guise of “neighborhood schools” they seek to take us back to the land of alleged separate but equal schools, which was held unconstitutional by the U.S. Supreme Court in 1954. They now attempt to take us back by bringing forth and using language very like what the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit found unconstitutional in the 1970’s. They now bring back what a group in Jefferson County sought to do a few years ago in attempting to have the Kentucky Courts interpret language to allow for “neighborhood schools” which the Kentucky Supreme Court would have no part of.

Some of the factors which drive us to this conclusion that H.B. 151 would further segregate Jefferson County Public Schools are –

  • On pure demographic bases Louisville/Jefferson County is segregated racially, economically, socially, culturally and custom by housing patterns (many intentionally)
  • All current schools are not equal in the quality of instruction, resources available and quality and adequacy of the physical learning facilities and equipment
  • There are insufficient number of schools in neighborhoods to ensure no unfair and deleterious impact and result on African American and low income students
  • The bill though neutral on its face is directed at Jefferson County Public Schools as it will not impact any other school district in Kentucky

These factors have not been considered by the proponents of HB 151. Nor have the financial impacts been studied to ensure all students get and receive an equal education without an unfair burden. One estimate alone has found that H.B. 151 would provide for 13,000 additional students to attend non-existing schools in West Louisville where there are not facilities to accommodate them.


The sponsors have provided no answers (either because they do not know or they do not care) to how learning will be addressed in schools where the impact of the bill will concentrate low income and poverty stricken students.

At the beginning of the 2016-2017 school year 91.6% of parents with students in JCPS were satisfied with their child’s school assignment. With this data what is the motivation for H.B. 151?


To get the community involved and supportive of JCPS student assignment plan many conces- sions were made to accommodate community desires. Have the sponsors considered how H.B. 151 impact those concessions? Probably not!


Education should be about student achievement. In no way does H.B. 151 address student achievement. They can cite to no study or finding that so-called neighborhood schools improves or have improved student achievement.


With no legitimate and creditable arguments or support for H.B. 151 the only logical conclusion is it is a direct attempt to further segregate Jefferson which is completely and totally unaccept-able. We encourage you to vote “NO”!

Sincerely,
Raoul Cunningham President




» Louisville Urban League Statement Re: HB 151
 
 

 




» JCPS Retiring Sooner Webinar
 
 

 Jefferson County Public Schools Retiring Sooner Webinar


Join us for a webinar on Mar 22, 2017 at 4:00 PM EDT. Register now! https://attendee.gotowebinar.com/register/1837791185727194882

Formerly known as Preretirement, "Retiring Sooner" is designed for members eligible to retire within the next five years. Webinar topics include: understanding your defined benefit retirement plan, the retirement process, postretirement employment, health insurance and the importance of staying informed about retirement.

After registering, you will receive a confirmation email containing information about joining the webinar.

View System Requirements

 

 

View All Articles »